4.8 Article

Spt5 histone binding activity preserves chromatin during transcription by RNA polymerase II

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2021109783

Keywords

chromatin; histone; RNA polymerase II; Spt5; transcription

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12016/13]
  2. Wellcome Trust [102943/Z/13/Z]
  3. National Institute of Health [R35 GM118015, K99GM134180]
  4. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30CA013696]
  5. Wellcome Trust [102943/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. MRC [MC_UU_12016/13] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In eukaryotes, the essential factor Spt5 plays a direct role in the process of re-deposition of nucleosomal histones during transcription. It contains an acidic amino terminal tail called Spt5N, which has a histone-binding motif that is essential for yeast cell viability.
Nucleosomes are disrupted transiently during eukaryotic transcription, yet the displaced histones must be retained and redeposited onto DNA, to preserve nucleosome density and associated histone modifications. Here, we show that the essential Spt5 processivity factor of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) plays a direct role in this process in budding yeast. Functional orthologues of eukaryotic Spt5 are present in archaea and bacteria, reflecting its universal role in RNA polymerase processivity. However, eukaryotic Spt5 is unique in having an acidic amino terminal tail (Spt5N) that is sandwiched between the downstream nucleosome and the upstream DNA that emerges from Pol II. We show that Spt5N contains a histone-binding motif that is required for viability in yeast cells and prevents loss of nucleosomal histones within actively transcribed regions. These findings indicate that eukaryotic Spt5 combines two essential activities, which together couple processive transcription to the efficient capture and re-deposition of nucleosomal histones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available