4.6 Article

Modeling of electrochemical oxide film growth - impact of band-to-band tunneling

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 406, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.139848

Keywords

Passivity; Metal oxides; Modeling; Point defect model; Band -to -band tunneling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study extended the common models to simulate oxide films and verified the assumptions. The results showed that the transport of electrons and holes has a buffering effect on the electric field, but does not lead to a constant electric field strength. When simulating oxide films with narrow band gaps and/or electrochemical reactions, the impact of electrons and holes needs to be considered.
The Point Defect Model (PDM) describes the corrosion resistance properties of oxide films based on in-terfacial reactions and defect transport, which are affected by the electric field inside the oxide film. The PDM assumes a constant electric field strength due to band-to-band tunneling (BTBT) of electrons and the separation of electrons and holes by high electric fields. In this manuscript we present a more complex expansion of the common models to simulate steady state oxide films to test this assumption. The R-PDM was extended by including the transport of electrons and holes and BTBT. It could be shown that BTBT only occurs in very rare cases of narrow band gaps and high electric fields and the impact of electrons and holes does indeed lead to a buffering effect on the electric field, but does not lead to a constant electric field strength. Modeling the transport of electrons and holes on the oxide film allows to specifically estimate their potential impact on the film growth. Especially during modeling of oxide films with narrow band gap and/or electrochemical reactions at the film/solution interface the electrons and holes needs to be included to the model.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available