4.6 Article

Hierarchical self-supported Ni(OH)2@Ni12P5 for supercapacitor electrodes with ultra-high area ratio capacitance

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 403, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139605

Keywords

Ordered Ni12P5; Self-supporting; Electrodeposition; Asymmetric supercapacitors 1

Funding

  1. Chinese Natural Science Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology [51874154]
  2. Analysis and Test Center of Kunming University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, Ni(OH)2@Ni12P5 electrodes were designed and prepared, showing superior electrochemical properties compared to directly deposited Ni(OH)2 electrodes. The assembled Ni(OH)2@Ni12P5//AC asymmetric supercapacitor exhibited a good energy density.
Transition metal hydroxides, due to their low cost and high theoretical capacity, are promising candidates for supercapacitors. However, the lower conductivity of hydroxides usually results in devices exhibiting poor specific capacity. Here, Ni(OH)(2)@Ni12P5 electrodes are designed and prepared, showing great potential for applications. This composite electrode, prepared by simple phosphating treatment and electrodeposition. Compared with the Ni(OH)(2) prepared by direct deposition, this rationally designed electrode exhibits more excellent electrochemical properties. The prepared Ni(OH)(2)@Ni12P5 electrode exhibits a good area specific capacitance of 15.89 F.cm(-2) at a current density of 10 mA.cm(-2), which is 2.93 times higher than that of the Ni(OH)(2) electrode (5.43 F.cm(-2)). In addition, the assembled Ni(OH)(2)@Ni12P5//AC asymmetric supercapacitor exhibits an energy density of 0.38 mWh.cm(-2) at a power density of 8.00 mW.cm(-2). Therefore, this work provides a new strategy for the synthesis of high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available