4.6 Article

EKF-based TS fuzzy prediction for eliminating the extremely fast reactive power variations in Manjil wind farm

Journal

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Volume 199, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107422

Keywords

Wind farm; Voltage flicker; Takagi-Sugeno (TS) fuzzy model; Extended Kalman filter (EKF); Static VAr compensator (SVC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel fuzzy one-step-ahead prediction approach for wind farm reactive power to enhance system performance and mitigate voltage flicker. By simulating with actual data from a wind farm in Manjil, Iran, the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed prediction method.
The inherent time-varying nature of the wind farm power causes undesired voltage flicker in the power network. In order to mitigate the flicker to enhance the performance of the wind power system with very fast dynamics, the static VAr compensator (SVC) is utilized. However, the SVC operates with some delays which negatively affects its performance. This persuades us to predict the reactive power of the wind farm to compensate for the real-world delay. The predicted reactive power is then utilized in the SVC. Therefore, this paper develops a novel fuzzy one-step-ahead prediction approach for the wind farm reactive power. The proposed fuzzy prediction uses a Takagi-Sugeno (TS) fuzzy representation whose unknown parameters are tuned online based on an extended Kalman filter (EKF). The wind farm is modeled as a time-varying current source which its amplitude and phase change every 0.01 s. A large set of the actual data of a wind farm in Manjil, Iran is gathered and directly utilized in the simulation process. Several flicker indices are calculated to evaluate the proposed prediction method. The obtained results show the performance enhancement and flicker mitigation of the suggested power scheme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available