4.6 Review

The role of extra-hepatic bile duct resection in the surgical management of gallbladder carcinoma. A first meta-analysis

Journal

EJSO
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 482-491

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.131

Keywords

Gallbladder carcinoma; Bile duct resection; Extra-hepatic bile duct resection; Common bile duct resection

Funding

  1. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2021YFS0100]
  2. West China Hospital, Sichuan University [2021HXBH127, ZYJC21046, 2021HXFH001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EHBDR does not provide a survival advantage for patients with gallbladder carcinoma, especially for non-jaundiced patients. The resected group has higher rates of disease recurrence, postoperative complications, and positive margins. Routine EHBDR is not recommended for non-jaundiced patients.
Objective: To systematically evaluate the clinicopathological and prognostic value of extra-hepatic bile duct resection (EHBDR) in the surgical management of patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), especially in non-jaundiced patients.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 1st 2021 for comparative studies between bile duct resected and non-resected groups. RevMan5.3 and Stata 13.0 software were used for the statistical analyses.Results: EHBDR did not correlate with a better overall survival (OS) (P = 0.17) or disease-free survival (P = 0.27). No survival benefit was also observed in patients with T2N1 (P = 0.4), T3N0 (P = 0.14) disease and node-positive patients (P = 0.75), rather, EHBDR was even harmful for patients with T2N0 (P = 0.01) and node-negative disease (P = 0.02). Significantly higher incidences of recurrent disease (P = 0.0007), postoperative complications (P < 0.00001) and positive margins (P = 0.02) were detected in the bile duct-resected group. The duration of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups was compa-rable (P = 0.58). Selection bias was also detected in our analysis that a significantly higher proportion of advanced lesions with T3-4 or III-IV disease was observed in the bile duct-resected group (P < 0.00001). EHBDR only contributed to a greater lymph yield (P = 0.01).Conclusion: EHBDR has no survival advantage for patients with GBC, especially for those with non-jaundiced disease. Considering the unfairness of comparing OS between jaundiced patients receiving EHBDR with non-jaundiced patients without EHBDR, we could only conclude that routine EHBDR in non-jaundiced patients is not recommended and future well-designed studies with more specific subgroup analyses are required for further validation.(C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available