Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Response Bias and Reliability in Verbal Agreement Rating Scales: Does Polarity and Verbalization of the Middle Category Matter?
Natalja Menold
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2021)
Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Comparison of Two IRTree Models to Investigate the Impact of Full Versus Endpoint-Only Response Option Labeling
Elisabeth M. Spratto et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2021)
Using Only Numeric Labels Instead of Verbal Labels: Stripping Rating Scales to Their Bare Minimum in Web Surveys
Tobias Gummer et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2021)
Completing Surveys With Different Item Formats: Testing Equivalence
Arne Weigold et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2021)
A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995-2019
Andrew T. Jebb et al.
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2021)
Horizontal or Vertical? The Effects of Visual Orientation of Categorical Response Options on Survey Responses in Web Surveys
Jingwei Hu
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2020)
Straightlining: Overview of Measurement, Comparison of Indicators, and Effects in Mail-Web Mixed-Mode Surveys
Yujin Kim et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2019)
Careless Responding Threatens Factorial Analytic Results and Construct Validity of Personality Measure
Chester Chun Seng Kam
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2019)
The impact of response options ordering on respondents' answers to rating questions: results of two experiments
Evgeniy Terentev et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2019)
The Effects of Features of Survey Measurement on Self-Rated Health: Response Option Order and Scale Orientation
Dana Garbarski et al.
APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE (2019)
Intra-individual Response Variability as an Indicator of Insufficient Effort Responding: Comparison to Other Indicators and Relationships with Individual Differences
Alexandra M. Dunn et al.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY (2018)
Scale direction effects in agree/disagree and item-specific questions: a comparison of question formats
Jan Karem Hoehne et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)
Improving the Factor Structure of Psychological Scales: The Expanded Format as an Alternative to the Likert Scale Format
Xijuan Zhang et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2016)
The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree
Keke Lai et al.
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (2016)
Presentation matters: how mode effects in item non-response depend on the presentation of response options
Eva Zeglovits et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2016)
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares
Cheng-Hsien Li
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2016)
The inter-item standard deviation (ISD): An index that discriminates between conscientious and random responders
Zdravko Marjanovic et al.
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (2015)
Best practice recommendations for data screening
Justin A. Desimone et al.
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR (2015)
A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures
Djurre Holtrop et al.
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (2014)
Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety
Erika J. Wolf et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2013)
Sample size requirements in structural equation models under standard conditions
Andreas I. Nicolaou et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2013)
Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load
Jimmie Leppink et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2013)
SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients
Bruce Weaver et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2013)
lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Yves Rosseel
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2012)
Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data
Adam W. Meade et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2012)
Positive First or Negative First? Effects of the Order of Answering Categories on Response Behavior
Dagmar Krebs et al.
METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (2010)
Designing Scalar Questions for Web Surveys
Leah Melani Christian et al.
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH (2009)
The HEXACO-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality
Michael C. Ashton et al.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT (2009)
COMPLETION TIME AND RESPONSE ORDER EFFECTS IN WEB SURVEYS
Neil Malhotra
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2008)
Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance
Fang Fang Chen
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL (2007)
Does response scale format affect the answering of personality scales? Assessing the big five dimensions of personality with different response scales in a dependent sample
Beatrice Rammstedt et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT (2007)
The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores:: A meta-analysis and review of the literature
NR Kuncel et al.
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (2005)
Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories
JA Johnson
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY (2005)
In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings
HW Marsh et al.
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL (2004)
Reactions to computerized testing in selection contexts
D Wiechmann et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT (2003)
Effects of response order on Likert-type scales
LJ Weng et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2000)
Share Paper
