4.8 Article

Balancing food acquisition and predation risk drives demographic changes in snowshoe hare population cycles

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 981-991

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13975

Keywords

behaviour; demography; food supplementation; Lepus americanus; population ecology; predator-sensitive foraging

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Northern Studies Training Program
  3. University of Alberta Northern Research Award program
  4. Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies
  5. W. Garfield Weston Foundation
  6. Government of Yukon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Snowshoe hare cycles are a significant ecological phenomenon. Food limitation and predation can interact and affect the survival and reproduction of snowshoe hares.
Snowshoe hare cycles are one of the most prominent phenomena in ecology. Experimental studies point to predation as the dominant driving factor, but previous experiments combining food supplementation and predator removal produced unexplained multiplicative effects on density. We examined the potential interactive effects of food limitation and predation in causing hare cycles using an individual-based food-supplementation experiment over-winter across three cycle phases that naturally varied in predation risk. Supplementation doubled over-winter survival with the largest effects occurring in the late increase phase. Although the proximate cause of mortality was predation, supplemented hares significantly decreased foraging time and selected for conifer habitat, potentially reducing their predation risk. Supplemented hares also lost less body mass which resulted in the production of larger leverets. Our results establish a mechanistic link between how foraging time, mass loss and predation risk affect survival and reproduction, potentially driving demographic changes associated with hare cycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available