4.8 Article

Addressing the Eltonian shortfall with trait-based interaction models

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 889-899

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13966

Keywords

ecological networks; ecological predictions; food web; model transferability; terrestrial vertebrates; trait matching; trophic interactions

Categories

Funding

  1. ERA-Net BiodivERsA - Belmont Forum [ANR-18-EBI4-0009]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2019-05771]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite limited knowledge, predicting species interactions based on functional traits is a promising approach. A new traits-based model of trophic interactions for European vertebrates was built, and even with minimal input data, the full European vertebrate food web could be reasonably estimated. However, predators were easier to predict than prey, and local food web connectivity was often overestimated.
We have very limited knowledge of how species interact in most communities and ecosystems despite trophic relationships being fundamental for linking biodiversity to ecosystem functioning. A promising approach to fill this gap is to predict interactions based on functional traits, but many questions remain about how well we can predict interactions for different taxa, ecosystems and amounts of input data. Here, we built a new traits-based model of trophic interactions for European vertebrates and found that even models calibrated with 0.1% of the interactions (100 out of 71 k) estimated the full European vertebrate food web reasonably well. However, predators were easier to predict than prey, especially for some clades (e.g. fowl and storks) and local food web connectance was consistently overestimated. Our results demonstrate the ability to rapidly generate food webs when empirical data are lacking-an important step towards a more complete and spatially explicit description of food webs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available