4.7 Article

The climate envelope of Alaska's northern treelines: implications for controlling factors and future treeline advance

Journal

ECOGRAPHY
Volume 44, Issue 11, Pages 1710-1722

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05597

Keywords

boreal forest; growth limitation hypothesis; permafrost; tundra-taiga ecotone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to investigate the relationship between boreal treelines in northern Alaska and the growth limitation hypothesis (GLH) isotherm, identifying key environmental factors influencing treeline presence and areas for potential treeline advance. Results showed that mean growing season air temperature (GSAT) at Alaska's northern treelines was consistently higher than the 6-7 degrees C isotherm, suggesting that low GSAT is unlikely to be the primary driver of treeline in northern Alaska. The final model included cumulative growing degree-days, near-surface permafrost probability and growing season total precipitation as important factors determining treeline position, with possible routes of treeline advance beyond current treelines.
Understanding the key mechanisms that control northern treelines is important to accurately predict biome shifts and terrestrial feedbacks to climate. At a global scale, it has long been observed that elevational and latitudinal treelines occur at similar mean growing season air temperature (GSAT) isotherms, inspiring the growth limitation hypothesis (GLH) that cold GSAT limits aboveground growth of treeline trees, with mean treeline GSAT similar to 6-7 degrees C. Treelines with mean GSAT warmer than 6-7 degrees C may indicate other limiting factors. Many treelines globally are not advancing despite warming, and other climate variables are rarely considered at broad scales. Our goals were to test whether current boreal treelines in northern Alaska correspond with the GLH isotherm, determine which environmental factors are most predictive of treeline presence, and identify areas beyond the current treeline where advance is most likely. We digitized similar to 12 400 km of treelines (>26 K points) and computed seasonal climate variables across northern Alaska. We then built a generalized additive model predicting treeline presence to identify key factors determining treeline. Two metrics of mean GSAT at Alaska's northern treelines were consistently warmer than the 6-7 degrees C isotherm (means of 8.5 degrees C and 9.3 degrees C), indicating that direct physiological limitation from low GSAT is unlikely to explain the position of treelines in northern Alaska. Our final model included cumulative growing degree-days, near-surface (<= 1 m) permafrost probability and growing season total precipitation, which together may represent the importance of soil temperature. Our results indicate that mean GSAT may not be the primary driver of treeline in northern Alaska or that its effect is mediated by other more proximate, and possibly non-climatic, controls. Our model predicts treeline potential in several areas beyond current treelines, pointing to possible routes of treeline advance if unconstrained by non-climatic factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available