Probabilistic seismic source location and magnitude via inverse analysis of paleoliquefaction evidence

In regions of infrequent moderate-to-large earthquakes, historic earthquake catalogs are often insufficient to provide inputs to seismic-hazard analyses (i.e. fault locations and magnitude-frequency relations) or to inform ground-motion predictions for certain seismic sources. In these regions, analysis of relic coseismic evidence, such as paleoliquefaction, is commonly used to infer information about the seismic hazard. However, while paleoliquefaction studies have been performed widely, all existing analysis techniques require a priori assumptions about the causative earthquake's location (i.e. rupture magnitude and ground motions can otherwise not be estimated). This may lead to inaccurate assumptions in some settings, and by corollary, erroneous results. Accordingly, this article proposes an inversion framework to probabilistically constrain seismic-source parameters from paleoliquefaction. Analyzing evidence at regional scale leads to (a) a geospatial likelihood surface that constrains the rupture location and (b) a probability distribution of the rupture magnitude, wherein source-location uncertainty is explicitly considered. Simulated paleoliquefaction studies are performed on earthquakes with known parameters. These examples demonstrate the framework's potential, even in cases of limited field evidence, as well as important caveats and lessons for forward use. The proposed framework has the potential to provide new insights in enigmatic seismic zones worldwide.

Automated summary

In regions with infrequent moderate-to-large earthquakes, historical earthquake catalogs may not be sufficient for seismic-hazard analyses. This article proposes a new framework to probabilistically determine seismic-source parameters from paleoliquefaction evidence. The framework has the potential to provide valuable insights in enigmatic seismic zones globally.