4.7 Article

Mechanisms of the Early 20th Century Warming in the Arctic

Journal

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103820

Keywords

Early 20th Century Warming; Global warming; Natural climate variability; Solar irradiance; Volcanism; Anthropogenic aerosols; Black carbon; Greenhouse gases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Early 20th Century Warming in the northern high latitudes was comparable in magnitude to the present-day warming, but occurred at a time when the growth in atmospheric greenhouse gases was significantly less than in the last 40 years. The causes of ETCW remain a matter of debate, with a combination of internal variability and external natural and human impacts likely playing a role in this climate anomaly.
The Early 20th Century Warming (ETCW) in the northern high latitudes was comparable in magnitude to the present-day warming yet occurred at a time when the growth in atmospheric greenhouse gases was rising significantly less than in the last 40 years. The causes of ETCW remain a matter of debate. The key issue is to assess the contribution of internal variability and external natural and human impacts to this climate anomaly. This paper provides an overview of plausible mechanisms related to the early warming period that involve different factors of internal climate variability and external forcing. Based on the vast variety of related studies, it is difficult to attribute ETCW in the Arctic to any of major internal variability mechanisms or external forcings alone. Most likely it was caused by a combined effect of long-term natural climate variations in the North Atlantic and North Pacific with a contribution of the natural radiative forcing related to the reduced volcanic activity and variations of solar activity as well as growing greenhouse gases concentration in the atmosphere due to anthropogenic emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available