Journal
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 225, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103892
Keywords
Discussion; Radiocarbon dating; Radiocarbon simulation; Laacher See
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Sweatman critiqued the evaluation of the YDIH and raised three points, but we proved that two of them were incorrect, and the third point had little effect on the results.
In his review of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH), Sweatman's (2021) critiques our simulation-based evaluation of the YDIH radiocarbon record (Jorgeson et al., 2020). He states that we compare dispersion in the radiocarbon datasets associated with the YDIH and the Laacher See volcanic eruption, that we do not account for old wood effects larger than 100 years, and that we do not account for recently published radiocarbon dates from Lake Hind. The first two critiques are incorrect, and we demonstrate that the third has an inconsequential effect on results.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available