4.5 Article

Experimental insights into the effect of event sequencing and sediment input texture on step-pool channel evolution

Journal

EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 569-581

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/esp.5272

Keywords

channel evolution; episodic sediment supply; event sequencing; sediment input texture; step-pool channel

Funding

  1. NSERC Discovery
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  3. China Scholarship Council [201906240039, 201906210321]
  4. Visiting International Research Students Grant [5139]
  5. UBC
  6. Mitacs Elevate
  7. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1508605]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The experiments showed that channel evolution in a step-pool channel is primarily controlled by the magnitude and frequency of sediment pulses and the grain size of sediment supply rather than the event sequencing of sediment pulses. A coarser sediment feed mixture led to increased sediment storage in the channel and step stability.
We conducted flume experiments in a step-pool channel with different sediment supply regimes to explore how the sequencing and the grain-size of sediment pulses affect channel evolution. Our results show that the sequencing of events is not a primary control as the trends in flow characteristics, bedload transport, sediment storage, step evolution, and step frequency were similar in feed phases with different sequencing of sediment pulses. Channel adjustment and step stability in a short timescale (i.e., in a 4-h run) were mostly controlled by the magnitude and frequency of sediment pulses. A coarser sediment feed mixture led to a coarser bed surface which increased both sediment storage in the channel and step stability. Our experiments show that channel evolution in a step-pool channel is primarily controlled by the magnitude and frequency of sediment pulses and the grain size of sediment supply rather than the event sequencing of sediment pulses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available