4.5 Article

Alluvial connectivity in multi-channel networks in rivers and estuaries

Journal

EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 477-490

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/esp.5261

Keywords

algorithms; bifurcation; connectivity; estuary; network

Funding

  1. Dutch Research Council (NWO) [639.023.208]
  2. Dutch Technology Foundation TTW [016.140.316/13710]
  3. H2020 European Research Council [ERCCoG 647570]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Channels in rivers and estuaries play a critical role in sediment transport. The study compares two mathematically rigorous methods for identifying channel networks and concludes that the local method is more conceptually effective and stable. Additionally, the concept of alluvial connectivity between channels is closely related to the displacement of sediment volume.
Channels in rivers and estuaries are the main paths of fluvial and tidal currents that transport sediment through the system. While network representations of multi-channel systems and their connectivity are quite useful for characterisation of braiding patterns and dynamics, the recognition of channels and their properties is complicated because of the large bed elevation variations, such as shallow shoals and bed steps that render channels visually disconnected. We present and analyse two mathematically rigorous methods to identify channel networks from a terrain model of the river bed. Both methods construct a dense network of locally steepest-descent channels from saddle points on the terrain, and select a subset of channels with a certain minimum sediment volume between them. This is closely linked to the main mechanism of channel formation and change by displacement of sediment volume. The two methods differ in how they compute these sediment volumes: either globally through the entire length of the river, or locally. We compare the methods for the measured bathymetry of the Western Scheldt estuary, The Netherlands, over the past decades. The global method is overly sensitive to small changes elsewhere in the network compared to the local method. We conclude that the local method works best conceptually and for stability reasons. The associated concept of alluvial connectivity between channels in a network is thus the inverse of the volume of sediment that must be displaced to merge the channels. Our method opens up possibilities for new analyses as shown in two examples. First, it shows a clear pattern of scale dependence on volume of the total network length and of the number of nodes by a power law relation, showing that the smaller channels are relatively much shorter. Second, channel bifurcations were found to be predominantly mildly asymmetrical, which is unexpected from fluvial bifurcation theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available