4.7 Article

Unfused vs fused thienoazacoronene-cored perylene diimide oligomer based acceptors for non-fullerene organic solar cells

Journal

DYES AND PIGMENTS
Volume 196, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109833

Keywords

Helical perylene diimide (PDI2); Non-fullerene; Organic solar cells; Ring-fusion; Thienoazacoronene

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21801201, 51773160, 21975194]
  2. research fund for distinguished young scholars of Hubei Province [2019CFA042]
  3. Wuhan University of Technology [40122004, 40120419, 3120619142, 35401020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that ring-fusion is a feasible design strategy to improve the photovoltaic performance of perylene diimide (PDI) based non-fullerene acceptors by affecting the conjugation degree of the central core. Specifically, the experiment results show that the non-fused NFA exhibits higher power conversion efficiency in organic solar cells.
Ring-fusion is a feasible design strategy to improve the photovoltaic performance of perylene diimide (PDI) based non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs) in which multiple PDI units are linked at the bay position to an aromatic central core. Research on the effect of ring-fusion in the case of large pi-conjugation cores is rarely investigated. In this contribution, the planar thienoazacoronene (TAC) was used as the central core, equipping with two ethylene bridged helical PDI dimer (PDI2), to afford the non-fused (TAC-diPDI2) and fused (FTAC-diPDI2) NFAs. The photovoltaic performances of these two NFAs were explored using PBDB-T as the electron donor. The non-fused TAC-diPDI2 based organic solar cells (OSCs) exhibits higher power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.59% than that of ring-fused FTAC-diPDI2 (4.24%). This result demonstrates that the conjugated degree of central core plays a vital role in the designing principle of ring-fusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available