4.5 Article

Valorization of spent coffee grounds: Encapsulation of bioactive compounds by different drying methods

Journal

DRYING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 15, Pages 3324-3339

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2022.2027960

Keywords

Spent espresso coffee; foam mat drying; wall material; microencapsulation; encapsulation efficiency

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates different drying methods for the microencapsulation of bioactive compounds extracted from espresso spent coffee. The dried products were characterized and compared, and the effects of different drying methods on the properties of the dried products were evaluated. The results show that all drying methods can produce dried products with good physicochemical properties and high levels of phenolic and antioxidant compounds.
In the present study, dryings by foam mat, foam mat freeze-drying, spray-drying and freeze-drying were proposed to microencapsulate bioactive compounds extracted from espresso spent coffee. Albumin, maltodextrin and gum arabic were used as wall materials, and the dried product was characterized and compared. The foams produced were dried in a tunnel dryer at different temperatures and air velocities. The drying time ranged from 200 to 450 min, and shorter drying times were obtained for the highest temperatures. For all drying methods, dried products with good physicochemical properties and high levels of phenolic and antioxidant compounds were obtained. The foam mat resulted in samples with higher moisture content and bulk density. On the other hand, freeze-dried samples had greater hygroscopicity and shorter wettability times. Spray-dried samples were lighter (highest value of parameter L*). The encapsulation efficiency values were between 66.46% and 88.01%, with the lowest values obtained for the foam mat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available