4.4 Article

Reliability and minimal detectable change of body-weight distribution and body sway between right and left brain-damaged patients at a chronic stage

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 260-265

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2030418

Keywords

Weight-bearing asymmetry; body sway; stroke; chronic; reliability; minimal detectable change

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the reliability and minimal detectable change of weight-bearing asymmetry and body sway under different visual conditions for patients with right brain damage (RBD) and left brain damage (LBD) at a chronic stage. The results showed that these parameters are highly reliable and can be used for clinical rehabilitation and research, but their reliability is lower under closed-eye conditions.
Purpose: To assess the reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of weight-bearing asymmetry (WBA) and body sway (BS) during eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions for those with right brain damage (RBD) and left brain damage (LBD) at a chronic stage. Methods: Sixteen RBD and 16 LBD patients participated in two sessions within 15 days, composed of two trials of 30s using a double force platform. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), the standard error of measurement (SEM), and MDC were calculated for WBA and BS (area and velocity of sway). Results: Reliability of WBA was excellent (>0.75) except for EC for LBD patients (low SEM was found). The condition of EC was similar to or less reliable than that of EO. The MDC of WBA was 5.4 and 7.3% for LBD and RBD patients, respectively. Velocity of sway should be favored over the area of sway due to better reliability, with an MDC of 9 and 13 mm/s for RBD and LBD patients, respectively. Conclusions: Parameters related to WBA and BS were highly reliable, without a difference between RBD and LBD patients, but less so in the condition of EC, and could be used for clinical rehabilitation and/or research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available