4.6 Article

Blind separation of sparse sources from nonlinear mixtures

Journal

DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103220

Keywords

Blind source separation; Nonlinear mixtures; Sparse sources; Polynomial approximations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores blind source separation (BSS) when sources are sparse signals with nonlinear combinations. It approximates the nonlinear mixtures with polynomial functions, estimates the sources and polynomial coefficients alternately, and discusses identifiability issues. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Blind source separation (BSS) has been studied well when the sources are sparse signals and their combinations are linear. Sparse component analysis (SCA) or dictionary learning algorithms propose well-known approaches for performing BSS in this model. In this study, we explore BSS when the sources are sparse signals, however, their combinations are nonlinear. The considered scenario can be adapted to several signal processing applications such as machine learning and system identification. To perform BSS, we first approximate the nonlinear mixture functions with the polynomial functions. Then, using an alternating approach, we estimate the sources and the coefficients of polynomial functions. The considered strategy is similar to one employed in dictionary learning algorithms for sparse representation of signals. In fact, in iterations where the sources are estimated, we cluster the signals, and in iterations where the coefficients of polynomial functions are estimated, we assign a polynomial manifold to each cluster. The identifiability issues of the considered nonlinear model are also discussed. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method relative to state-of-the-art methods. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available