Journal
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
Volume 67, Issue 8, Pages 3797-3805Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07303-9
Keywords
Cholangiocarcinoma; FGFR2 protein; Genomics; Immunohistochemistry
Categories
Funding
- National Institute of Health (NIH) through a DP2 Award [CA195764]
- National Cancer Institute (NCI) [CA090628, 5P50CA210964-03, CA234324, 3P50CA210964-02S1]
- Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine (CIM) Precision Cancer Therapeutics Program
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Immunohistochemistry staining with two antibodies against FGFR2 showed high accuracy and specificity, but only moderate sensitivity, for detecting FGFR2 genomic alterations in cholangiocarcinoma. However, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes including overall survival, progression-free survival, and time-to-tumor recurrence between patients with positive or negative FGFR2 staining in a median follow-up of 72 months.
Background FGFR2 genomic alterations are observed in 10-20% of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Although FGFR2 fusions are an important actionable target, FGFR2 protein expression has not been thoroughly characterized. Aims To evaluate FGFR2 protein expression in cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 genomic alterations. Methods FGFR2 protein expression was evaluated in 99 CCA cases with two different antibodies. FGFR2 genomic alterations were confirmed via next-generating sequencing (NGS) or FISH. Primary objective was to determine the specificity and sensitivity of FGFR2 immunohistochemistry staining for detecting FGFR2 genomic alterations. Secondary objectives included overall FGFR2 immunohistochemistry staining in CCA patients, and evaluation of whether FGFR2 expression correlates with clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-tumor recurrence (TTR). Results Immunohistochemistry staining with two antibodies against FGFR2, FPR2-D, and clone 98706 showed high accuracy (78.7% and 91.9%) and specificity (82.9% and 97.7%), and moderate sensitivity (53.9% and 57.1%), respectively, when compared with the standard methods for detecting FGFR2 genomic alterations. In a median follow-up of 72 months, there were no statistically significant differences in OS, PFS, and TTR, for patients with positive or negative FGFR2 staining. Conclusion FGFR2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry has high specificity and therefore could be used to imply the presence of FGFR2 genomic alterations in the context of a positive test. In the case of a negative test, NGS or FISH would be necessary to ascertain cases with FGFR2 genomic alterations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available