4.5 Article

Time course and risk factors of evolution from potential to overt autoimmune gastritis

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 642-644

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.10.001

Keywords

Anti-parietal cell antibody; Autoimmune gastritis; Corpus atrophy; Hashimoto?s thyroiditis; Potential

Funding

  1. University of Pavia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Approximately half of potential autoimmune gastritis patients will progress to overt autoimmune gastritis within two years, especially those with concurrent autoimmune disorders.
Background: The natural history of patients with potential autoimmune gastritis (AIG), defined by the presence of serum anti-parietal cell antibody (PCA) positivity and no gastric histopathological alterations, is unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the natural history and clinical correlates of potential autoimmune gastritis (AIG). Methods: In 20 0 0-2019, we enrolled potential AIG patients by monitoring once a year (+/- 6 months) histopathological evolution into overt AIG, defined as the occurrence of atrophy in the oxyntic mucosa. Factors affecting disease progression were assessed. Results: Fifty-one potential AIG patients (median age 57 years, IQR 43-73, F:M ratio 1.7:1) were monitored for up to 15 years (median 6 years, IQR 3-8). Of them, 24 (47.1%) evolved into overt AIG in a median time of 2 years (IQR 2-4.5). Having a concomitant autoimmune disorder (HR 4.09, 95% CI 1.52- 11.00; p = 0.005), but not older age (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.45-2.22; p = 0.992) and female sex (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.51-2.78; p = 0.395), was associated with evolution into overt AIG. Conclusions: Roughly one in two potential AIG patients will evolve into overt AIG over a median time of two years, especially those with a concurrent autoimmune disorder. (c) 2021 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available