4.5 Article

Vedolizumab may be an effective option for the treatment of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 629-634

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.11.021

Keywords

Post-surgical recurrence; Real-world; Rutgeerts; SN-IBD; Vedolizumab

Funding

  1. MSD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the effectiveness of Vedolizumab (VDZ) in the treatment of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease (CD). The results suggest that VDZ may be an effective option for treating CD postoperative recurrence.
Background: The role of Vedolizumab (VDZ) as therapeutic option for the postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease (CD) following ileocolonic resection is unknown. Aims: To assess the effectiveness of VDZ in this setting. Methods: All consecutive CD patients with a baseline colonoscopy at 6-12 months from the ileocolonic resection showing postoperative recurrence (Rutgeerts score >= i2) and treated with VDZ after the baseline colonoscopy were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (SNIBD). The primary outcome was endoscopic success, assessed at the first colonoscopy following initiation of VDZ and defined as reduction of at least one point of Rutgeerts score. The secondary outcome was clinical failure, assessed at one year and at the end of follow-up. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included (mean follow-up: 24.8 +/- 13.1 months). Endoscopic success was reported in 47.6% of patients. Clinical failure was reported in 19.0% of patients at one year, and in 32.8% of patients at the end of follow-up. A new resection was required in 7 patients (12.1%). Conclusions: VDZ may be an effective option for the treatment of postoperative recurrence of CD. (c) 2021 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available