4.5 Article

Temporal trends in intensification of glucose-lowering therapy for type 2 diabetes in Italy: Data from the AMD Annals initiative and their impact on clinical inertia

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 181, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109096

Keywords

Clinical inertia; Type 2 diabetes; Prospective observational study; HbA1c

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that during a long-term observation period, T2DM patients intensified treatment earlier and achieved better metabolic control over time.
Aims: Clinical inertia negatively affects type 2 diabetes (T2DM) management. We evaluated changes in prescription patterns of hypoglycemic drugs during a 15 year-observation period in a large population of T2DM outpatients and their effect on metabolic control. Methods: Data on all T2DM patients attending 258 Italian diabetes clinics between 2005 and 2019 were collected and analyzed for three 5-years periods. The addition of a second drug to metformin and the addition of a third agent to dual therapy were evaluated. Results: During the observation period, 437.179 patients added a second drug to metformin. The intensification occurred earlier over time: patients had a shorter duration of disease and a better cardiovascular risk profile in the last five years, compared to previous periods. During the same period, 208.767 patients added a third agent to dual therapy. Duration of diabetes at the time of intensification decreased, and cardiovascular risk profile improved over time. Also HbA1c levels at the time of intensification decreased over time. Conclusions: in this large cohort of T2MD subjects during a long observation period an earlier treatment intensification and a better metabolic control were observed, suggesting an improved approach to clinical inertia. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available