4.7 Article

Acute brain vascular regeneration occurs via lymphatic transdifferentiation

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
Volume 56, Issue 22, Pages 3115-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.09.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31730060, 32000576]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0882]
  3. 111 Program [B14037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study in zebrafish cerebrovascular injury models reveals that the earliest regenerated blood vessels originate from lymphatic transdifferentiation via Notch activation. This process only occurs in stand-alone lymphatic vessels, while late-regenerated blood vessels form through a different mechanism.
Acute ischemic stroke damages the regional brain blood vessel (BV) network. Acute recovery of basic blood flows, which is carried out by the earliest regenerated BVs, are critical to improve clinical outcomes and minimize lethality. Although the late-regenerated BVs form via growing along the meninge-derived ingrown lymphatic vessels (iLVs), mechanisms underlying the early, acute BV regeneration remain elusive. Using zebrafish cerebrovascular injury models, we show that the earliest regenerated BVs come from lymphatic trans differentiation, a hitherto unappreciated process in vertebrates. Mechanistically, the LV-to-BV transdifferentiation occurs exclusively in the stand-alone iLVs through Notch activation. In the track iLVs adhered by late regenerated BVs, transdifferentiation never occurs because the BV-expressing EphrinB2a paracellularly activates the iLV-expressing EphB4a to inhibit Notch activation. Suppression of LV-to-BV transdifferentiation blocks acute BV regeneration and becomes lethal. These results demonstrate that acute BV regeneration occurs via lymphatic transdifferentiation, suggesting this process and key regulatory molecules EphrinB2a/ EphB4a/Notch as new postischemic therapeutic targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available