4.3 Review

Are Specific Body Sites Prone for Wound Infection After Skin Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 406-410

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003387

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for wound infection in dermatologic surgery. The results showed that the lips, lower extremities, and possibly the ears and hands had a higher risk of infection, while the trunk had the lowest infection rate.
INTRODUCTION Identifying risk factors for wound infection may guide clinical practice for optimal use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery. OBJECTIVE To summarize the current evidence whether specific body sites have higher risks for surgical site infections (SSI). Methods The systematic literature search included MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and trial registers. Only observational studies qualified for inclusion and meta-analysis. We assessed the risk of bias according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Eighteen studies with 33,086 surgical wounds were eligible. Eight studies were of good, 4 of fair, and 6 of poor quality. The mean infection rate was 4.08%. Meta-analysis showed that the lips had significantly higher infection rates. The lower extremity and ears had or tended toward a higher risk for infection, but studies were clinically heterogeneous. A large prospective trial found that surgical wounds on the hands were at higher risk for infection. The trunk showed the lowest infection rate. The risk for SSI in other body locations was not different or remained uncertain because of substantial heterogeneity among studies. CONCLUSION Lips, lower extremities, and probably ears and hands may have a higher risk for wound infection after skin surgery. The trunk showed the lowest infection rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available