4.5 Article

Trust Evaluation in Online Social Networks Using Generalized Network Flow

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 952-963

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TC.2015.2435785

Keywords

Generalized network flow; online social networks (OSNs); path dependence; trust decay; trust evaluation

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [CNS 149860, CNS 1461932, CNS 1460971, CNS 1439672, CNS 1301774, ECCS 1231461, ECCS 1128209, CNS 1138963]
  2. NSFC [61272151, 61472451]
  3. ISTCP [2013DFB10070]
  4. China Hunan Provincial Science & Technology Program [2012GK4106]
  5. Chinese Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [531107040845]
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1231461] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In online social networks (OSNs), to evaluate trust from one user to another indirectly connected user, the trust evidence in the trusted paths (i.e., paths built through intermediate trustful users) should be carefully treated. Some paths may overlap with each other, leading to a unique challenge of path dependence, i.e., how to aggregate the trust values of multiple dependent trusted paths. OSNs bear the characteristic of high clustering, which makes the path dependence phenomenon common. Another challenge is trust decay through propagation, i.e., how to propagate trust along a trusted path, considering the possible decay in each node. We analyze the similarity between trust propagation and network flow, and convert a trust evaluation task with path dependence and trust decay into a generalized network flow problem. We propose a modified flow-based trust evaluation scheme GFTrust, in which we address path dependence using network flow, and model trust decay with the leakage associated with each node. Experimental results, with the real social network data sets of Epinions and Advogato, demonstrate that GFTrust can predict trust in OSNs with a high accuracy, and verify its preferable properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available