4.3 Review

Utility of bedside ultrasound derived hepatic and renal parenchymal flow patterns to guide management of acute kidney injury

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 587-592

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000899

Keywords

acute kidney injury; renal congestion; venous excess ultrasound score; volume status

Ask authors/readers for more resources

VExUS scoring is valuable in predicting AKI and guiding fluid balance in critically ill patients. Hepatic vein ultrasound can be a manifestation of heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. VExUS scoring helps in decision-making to remove fluid in patients with cardiorenal syndrome.
Purpose of review Ideal fluid management of critically ill patients is maintaining an adequate perfusion pressure but avoiding venous congestion. Venous excess ultrasound score (VExUS) quantifies venous congestion to guide the management of fluid balance. Recent findings VExUS of abdominal veins measures fluid tolerance and helps clinicians avoid congestion. VExUS scoring predicts the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) that is a common hospital problem resulting in higher mortality and morbidity. VExUS can predict patients at risk of developing AKI post cardiac surgery. VExUS has been associated with an increase in adverse outcomes in a general intensive care population. Hepatic vein ultrasound can manifest as a sequela of right heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Intrarenal congestion suggests poorer prognosis in heart failure patients. VExUS score has been used in decision-making to remove fluid in patients with cardiorenal syndrome. VExUS scoring may help curtail overly aggressive fluid resuscitation for patients with septic shock and help avoid iatrogenic 'salt water drowning' We summarize the technique and clinical practice of VExUS to help guide fluid balance across different populations of critically ill patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available