3.9 Article

'PHOTOGRAPHY' AS A USEFUL METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE DENSITY, SEX-RATIO AND BODY SIZE OF THE SURFACE-ACTIVE AUSTRUCA PERPLEXA (H. MILNE EDWARDS, 1852) (BRACHYURA, OCYPODIDAE)

Journal

CRUSTACEANA
Volume 94, Issue 11-12, Pages 1429-1440

Publisher

BRILL
DOI: 10.1163/15685403-bja10164

Keywords

Burrow excavation; GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP); photography; sex-ratio; surface-active fiddler crabs

Funding

  1. Faculty of Science and Technology, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University, Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the non-destructive 'photography' method with the 'burrow excavation' method in estimating crab density, sex-ratio, and body sizes in a fiddler crab population. The results showed that there were no differences in the parameters estimated between the two methods. This suggests that the 'photography' method could be a suitable alternative to the 'burrow excavation' method.
Estimations of crab density, sex-ratio, and body sizes are difficult. Though the 'burrow excavation' method is widely used to estimate these parameters in surface-active crabs, it is destructive to crab populations. Therefore, an alternative, non-destructive method is desirable. This study compared the non-destructive 'photography' method with the 'burrow excavation' method in a fiddler crab (Austruca perplexa (H. Milne Edwards, 1852)) population. Twenty 0.25 m2 quadrats were set out and 4 photos were taken of the surface-active crabs in each quadrat. All crab burrows were then excavated, and the crabs were collected to estimate their numbers, sexes, and body and claw sizes. Afterward, the photographs were analysed to estimate the same parameters by using the GIMP program. These parameters were then compared between the two methods. The results showed that these parameters were not different between the methods compared. This study thus reveals that the 'photography' method could safely be used instead of the 'burrow excavation' method, and yield the same results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available