4.7 Review

Current extraction, purification, and identification techniques of tea polyphenols: An updated review

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
Volume 63, Issue 19, Pages 3912-3930

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1995843

Keywords

Camellia sinensis L; catechins; identification; isolation; purification; tea beverage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review introduces the classification of tea and summarizes the conventional and novel techniques for the extraction and purification of tea polyphenols. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are intensively discussed and compared. The review aims to provide a research basis for the green and efficient utilization of tea polyphenols.
Tea, as a beverage, has been reputed for its health benefits and gained worldwide popularity. Tea polyphenols, especially catechins, as the main bioactive compounds in tea, exhibit diverse health benefits and have wide applications in the food industry. The development of tea polyphenol-incorporated products is dependent on the extraction, purification, and identification of tea polyphenols. Recent years, many green and novel extraction, purification, and identification techniques have been developed for the preparation of tea polyphenols. This review, therefore, introduces the classification of tea and summarizes the main conventional and novel techniques for the extraction of polyphenols from various tea products. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are also intensively discussed and compared. In addition, the purification and identification techniques are summarized. It is hoped that this updated review can provide a research basis for the green and efficient extraction, purification, and identification of tea polyphenols, which can facilitate their utilization in the production of various functional food products and nutraceuticals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available