4.6 Article

The neural inhibition network is causally involved in the disembodiment effect of linguistic negation

Journal

CORTEX
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages 72-82

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.11.015

Keywords

Embodied cognition; Negation; Action-language; Inhibition; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [RTI 2018098730-B-I00, BES-2016-078438]
  2. European Regional Development Funds [RTI 2018098730-B-I00, BES-2016-078438]
  3. Bial foundation [347/18]
  4. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna [339bis/2017]
  5. Cogito foundation [R-117/13, 14-139-R]
  6. Ministero Istruzione Universita e Ricerca [2017N7WCLP]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Applying negation in action contexts reduces motor system activation. The right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), a key area of the inhibitory control system, was found to contribute to the processing of negated action-sentences in the primary motor cortex (M1). Modulating rIFG suppressed the inhibitory effect of negation, resulting in equal motor excitability for negative and affirmative action sentences.
Negation applied to action contexts reduces the activation of the motor system. According to the Reusing Inhibition for Negation (RIN) hypothesis, such disembodiment effect occurs because understanding negations engages the reuse of inhibitory control mechanisms. Here, we investigated whether the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) -a key area of the inhibitory control system -contributes to primary motor cortex (M1) processing of negated action-sentences. Using a perturb-and-measure paradigm, we applied off-line low-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) over the rIFG, before performing a reading task involving action and attentional sentences presented in both affirmative or negative form. During the reading task, motor excitability was assessed by recording motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by single-pulse TMS (spTMS) over the left M1, at two loci in the sentence: the verb or the object. Results show that after sham stimulation (baseline), motor excitability measured on the verb, was reduced for negative, compared to affirmative action sentences. Crucially, neuromodulation of rIFG suppressed this inhibitory effect of negation, since motor excitability was equaled for negative and affirmative action sentences. As expected, no effect of negation was observed for attentional sentences or when the pulse was delivered over the object. Our study confirms that understanding negative action sentences inhibits M1. This effect took place at an early stage of semantic processing (i.e., while processing the verb in our task), and faded at a later time-point. Critically, by highlighting a causal role of rIFG in this motor inhibition, we provide direct neurophysiological support to the RIN hypothesis.(c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available