4.7 Article

Understanding the importance of carbonates on the performance of Portland metakaolin cement

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 319, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126155

Keywords

Metakaolin; Carboaluminates; Stratlingite; Durability; LC3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the influence of different carbonate and non-carbonate sources on the performance of Portland metakaolin cement binder, showing that the additives have an impact on early strength but minimal effect on later compressive strength; the absence of carbonate ions may lead to the formation of stratlingite, speculated to contribute to later age strength development. No significant difference was observed in porosity, electrical resistivity, or carbonation resistance between binders containing carbonate or non-carbonate sources at later age.
This study investigates the influence of different carbonate (limestone, dolomite and magnesite) and non-carbonate (fly ash, quartz and metakaolin) sources on the performance of Portland metakaolin cement binder. Mortar and paste specimens were cast for six binders comprising 50% clinker, 30% metakaolin, 5% gypsum and 15% of each of the carbonate and non-carbonate sources at a water to binder ratio of 0.5. Carbolaluminate phases were formed in binders containing any of the three carbonate sources. The beneficial effect of formation of carboaluminates was observed for early age (7 days) compressive strength values, however, the later age (90 days) compressive strength values were similar for all the binders. In the absence of the carbonate ions the formation of stratlingite was prominent, which is speculated to contribute in later age strength development. No appreciable difference was observed in the porosity, electrical resistivity or carbonation resistance between the binders containing carbonate or non-carbonate source at later age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available