4.7 Article

Comparing performances of MICP bacterial vegetative cell and microencapsulated bacterial spore methods on concrete crack healing

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 302, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124227

Keywords

Microbially induced calcium carbonate; precipitation (MICP); Vegetative cells; Microencapsulated bacterial spore; Crack closing; Self-healing concrete

Funding

  1. Asahi Glass Foundation
  2. Ratchadapisek Sompoch Endowment Fund
  3. Chulalongkorn University [764002-ENV]
  4. Second Century Fund (C2F)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the crack healing performances of self-healing concretes using cell/nutrient dropping and immobilization methods. Results showed that the cell dropping method was more effective in closing cracks and recovering ultimate load after repair, while specimens mixed with microencapsulated bacterial spores exhibited lower ultimate loads than control specimens.
This study compares the crack healing performances of biological self-healing concretes using cell/nutrient dropping and immobilization methods to produce microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP). Vegetative cells and microencapsulated bacterial spores of Bacillus sphaericus (LMG 22257) were used to heal pre -cracked mortars. Mortar specimens were cured for 7 and 28 days before pre-cracking, and then repaired under wet-dry cycles for 7 days. Comparisons were made in terms of crack-width and crack-area healing and load recovery after repairing. Results showed that the vegetative cell dropping method was more effective in closing cracks and recovering ultimate load after repair than the method of using immobilized microencapsulated bacterial spores for mortar repair. In fact, specimens mixed with microencapsulated bacterial spores exhibited lower ultimate loads than comparable control specimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available