4.7 Article

Deep neural survival networks for cardiovascular risk prediction: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Journal

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104983

Keywords

Machine learning; Deep neural survival networks; Event prediction; MESA; Risk factors; Biomarkers

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1920920]
  2. American Heart Association [AHA-17PRE33660333]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study followed 6814 participants for 16 years and found that the DeepSurv model significantly outperformed the COXPH model in ASCVD risk prediction, accurately predicting MAE and mortality. Results showed that DeepSurv was the only learning algorithm to significantly improve risk score criteria.
Background: There is growing interest in utilizing machine learning techniques for routine atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk prediction. We investigated whether novel deep learning survival models can augment ASCVD risk prediction over existing statistical and machine learning approaches. Methods: 6814 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) were followed over 16 years to assess incidence of all-cause mortality (mortality) or a composite of major adverse events (MAE). Features were evaluated within the categories of traditional risk factors, inflammatory biomarkers, and imaging markers. Data was split into an internal training/testing (four centers) and external validation (two centers). Both machine learning (COXPH, RSF, and lSVM) and deep learning (nMTLR and DeepSurv) models were evaluated. Results: In comparison to the COXPH model, DeepSurv significantly improved ASCVD risk prediction for MAE (AUC: 0.82 vs. 0.80, P < 0.001) and mortality (AUC: 0.87 vs. 0.84, P 0.001) with traditional risk factors alone. Implementing non-categorical NRI, we noted a 40% increase in correct reclassification compared to the COXPH model for both MAE and mortality (P < 0.05). Assessing the relative risk of participants, DeepSurv was the only learning algorithm to develop a significantly improved risk score criteria, which outcompeted COXPH for both MAE (4.22 vs. 3.61, P = 0.043) and mortality (6.81 vs. 5.52, P = 0.044). The addition of inflammatory or imaging biomarkers to traditional risk factors showed minimal/no significant improvement in model prediction. Conclusion: DeepSurv can leverage simple office-based clinical features alone to accurately predict ASCVD risk and cardiovascular outcomes, without the need for additional features, such as inflammatory and imaging biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available