4.7 Article

Least square and Gaussian process for image based microalgal density estimation

Journal

COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
Volume 193, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106678

Keywords

Microalgae; Microalgal density; Gaussian process; Least square; Image processing; Algal monitoring; Online estimation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficiently monitoring microalgal density in closed systems is crucial. Existing image analysis methods are limited to specific strains, so this paper proposes a generic approach to optimize the parameters and applies a nonlinear regression model for accurate estimation of microalgal density. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated through experiments with real-world data.
Efficiently monitoring microalgal density in real time is critical in closed systems of cultivating algae. In the monitoring methods proposed in the literature, image based techniques present practically potential since they are nondestructive and more biosecured. However, in the existing image analysis methods, parameters of the color-to-grayscale conversion formulae are predefined and only applicable to monitor some specific microalgae strains. Therefore, in this paper we propose a generic approach based on least square to optimize those parameters, which are data-driven and can be used to monitor any type of microalgae. More importantly, apart from the widely used linear regression paradigm, we propose a nonlinear regression model based on Gaussian process to better learn relationship between data representation of measured images and densities of microalgae. The nonlinear regression model is then utilized to efficiently estimate density of algal species. The proposed approach was evaluated in the real-world dataset of Chlorella vulgaris microalgae, where the obtained results as compared with those obtained by some existing techniques demonstrate its effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available