4.5 Article

Optimization of sensor selection problem in IoT systems using opposition-based learning in many-objective evolutionary algorithms

Journal

COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107625

Keywords

Optimization; Many-objective optimization; Metaheuristics; Sensors selection in IoT; Opposition based learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the sensor selection problem in IoT systems, treating it as a multi-objective optimization problem with 5 objectives. A Decomposition-based Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm and Opposition Based Learning are incorporated to solve the problem. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms other compared algorithms.
In the Internet of Things (IoT) systems, physical objects are connected to each other through sensor devices that serve multiple functionalities. The sensor selection is known to be an NP-hard problem. Thus, Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) can be incorporated to solve the sensor selection problem in IoT systems. Previously, researchers have been working on sensor selection problems with two or three objectives. Recently, this problem is formulated as a many-objective optimization problem and solved using a Decomposition-based Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA/D). In this paper, we consider the sensor selection problem as a many-objective problem with 5 objectives. To accelerate the convergence, we incorporate Opposition Based Learning (OBL) in the general framework of MOEA/D. Furthermore, we use a well-known many-objective algorithm known as the Non-dominated Sorting based Genetic Algorithm incorporated with OBL (NSGA-III/OBL) to enhance its convergence and diversity. The experimental results show that NSGA-III/OBL outperforms all other compared algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available