4.7 Article

Phase distribution and properties identification of heterogeneous materials: A data-driven approach

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.114354

Keywords

Data -driven computational mechanics; Data -driven identification; Correspondence analysis; Digital image correlation; Composites

Funding

  1. European Union [764636]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [764636] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a new methodology to extend the Data-Driven Identification (DDI) to heterogeneous samples made of multiple elastic materials. By using the Correspondence Analysis (CA) technique to post-process DDI, the study is able to identify representative material databases for each phase and localize the different phases in the sample. It shows that the method is effective for estimating stresses and identifying different phases in the sample, and it can be improved by iterating between DDI and CA when input data is limited.
This paper presents a new methodology to extend the Data-Driven Identification (DDI) to heterogeneous samples made of multiple elastic materials. By using the Correspondence Analysis (CA) technique to post-process DDI, we are able to identify multiple material databases representative of the material behavior of each phase. Simultaneously, we localize the different phases (matrix and inclusions) in the sample. For different contrasts between phases, the method is tested on synthetically generated data and a parametric study is performed. Furthermore, we show that it is possible to iterate between DDI and CA in order to improve the method's predictions when it is limited by scarce input data. In all the cases studied, the methodology proves to be effective for estimating stresses, as well as for identifying the different phases in the sample.(c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available