4.2 Article

Efficient Algorithms and Implementation of a Semiparametric Joint Model for Longitudinal and Competing Risk Data: With Applications to Massive Biobank Data

Journal

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2022/1362913

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30 CA-16042, UL1TR000124-02, P01AT003960]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R35GM141798]
  3. National Human Genome Research Institute [R01HG006139]
  4. National Science Foundation [DMS-2054253]
  5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease [K01DK106116]
  6. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R21HL150374]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper addresses the computational barriers in semiparametric joint models for longitudinal and competing risk survival data, and proposes customized linear scan algorithms to reduce computational complexities and significantly speed up the existing methods.
Semiparametric joint models of longitudinal and competing risk data are computationally costly, and their current implementations do not scale well to massive biobank data. This paper identifies and addresses some key computational barriers in a semiparametric joint model for longitudinal and competing risk survival data. By developing and implementing customized linear scan algorithms, we reduce the computational complexities from O(n(2)) or O(n(3)) to On in various steps including numerical integration, risk set calculation, and standard error estimation, where n is the number of subjects. Using both simulated and real-world biobank data, we demonstrate that these linear scan algorithms can speed up the existing methods by a factor of up to hundreds of thousands when n > 10(4), often reducing the runtime from days to minutes. We have developed an R package, FastJM, based on the proposed algorithms for joint modeling of longitudinal and competing risk time-to-event data and made it publicly available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available