4.7 Review

Shrinkage in frozen desserts

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12888

Keywords

ice cream; frozen desserts; shrinkage; air; serum interface; frozen foams

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shrinkage in frozen desserts is a well-documented issue characterized by loss of volume during storage, with factors such as protein content, solid content, overrun, external temperature fluctuations, and pressure affecting it. Understanding the collapse of frozen foam due to destabilization of dispersed air phase is crucial in preventing shrinkage. Functional ingredients and processing methods that optimize formation and stabilization of frozen foam are essential in addressing shrinkage in frozen desserts.
Shrinkage is a well-documented defect in frozen desserts, yet the root causes and mechanisms remain unknown. Characterized by the loss of volume during storage, shrinkage arose during the mid-twentieth century as production of frozen desserts grew to accommodate a larger market. Early research found that shrinkage was promoted by high protein, solids, and overrun, as well as postproduction factors such as fluctuations in external temperature and pressure. Rather than approaching shrinkage as a cause-and-effect defect as previous approaches have, we employ a physicochemical approach to characterize and understand shrinkage as collapse of the frozen foam caused by destabilization of the dispersed air phase. The interfacial composition and physical properties, as well as the kinetic stability of air cells within the frozen matrix ultimately affect product susceptibility to shrinkage. The mechanism of shrinkage remains unknown, as frozen desserts are highly complex, but is rooted in the physicochemical properties of the frozen foam. Functional ingredients and processing methods that optimize the formation and stabilization of the frozen foam are essential to preventing shrinkage in frozen desserts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available