4.7 Article

High-performance para-aramid paper strengthened by ultrafine fiber pulp of polyphenylene sulfide

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 216, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109073

Keywords

Aramid paper; Polyphenylene sulfide ultrafine fiber; Wet paper-making; Tensile strength; Tear strength

Funding

  1. National Sci-ence and Technology Support Program [2015BAE01B04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study fabricated ACFs/PPS composite paper sheets using modern wet papermaking techniques, which significantly improved mechanical properties and thermal stability, showing promising potential in high-tech areas.
Owing to its excellent heat resistance, lightness, insulation, and mechanical properties, aramid paper has been widely used in aerospace, rail transit, military, and other high-tech areas. With the rapid development of modern industries, para-aramid paper-based materials have become the development direction and trend of the specialty paper industry. In this study, para-aramid chopped fibers/polyphenylene sulfide (ACFs/PPS) composite paper sheets were fabricated by modern wet papermaking. The tensile strength, tensile index, and tear index of the hotpressed ACFs/PPS composite paper sheets were substantially improved, reaching 103.5 MPa, 80.9 N m/g, and 119.1 mN m2/g under optimal speed of hot-pressing roller (0.2 m/min), hot-pressing temperature (310 degrees C), hotpressing pressure (0.2 MPa), and ACFs content (70 wt%). The mechanical properties of hot-pressed ACF/PPS composite paper were markedly superior. Besides, the dielectric constant of the composite paper remained stable even when the temperature reached 100 degrees C. Briefly stated, ACFs/PPS composite paper exhibits desirable mechanical performance, thermostability, high breakdown strength, and low dielectric constant, delivering great potentials in the high-tech areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available