4.7 Article

Characterising the variability in wrinkling during the preforming of non-crimp fabrics

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106536

Keywords

Fabrics; textiles [A]; Defects [B]; Preforming [E]; Resin Transfer Moulding (RTM)

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council as part of the EPSRC Future Composites Manufacturing Research Hub [EP/P006701/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes the variability in the wrinkling behavior of a biaxial non-crimp fabric under different conditions during hemispherical preforming and develops a method to quantify the variability in wrinkle amplitude and location. The results indicate that fabric architecture and forming layup significantly influence wrinkle amplitude and location variability, with location variability being more sensitive to changes in the forming process.
The preforming of textile reinforcements during composite manufacturing is subject to significant variability, which affects the predictability of critical defects such as wrinkles in the component. Therefore, wrinkling variability needs to be quantified so that it can be accounted for during production and in process simulations. This study characterises the variability in the wrinkling behaviour of a biaxial non-crimp fabric during hemispherical preforming under various conditions. A variability characterisation method is developed that decouples and quantifies the variability in wrinkle amplitude and wrinkle location. The results show that the fabric architecture and the specific forming layup have a significant influence on both the wrinkle amplitude and location variability, with the location variability being more sensitive to changes in the forming process than the amplitude variability. The method can be applied to characterise the variability for various surface defects or variables and thus used as a benchmarking tool for preforming processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available