4.7 Article

Progressive fatigue damage model for FRP wires under longitudinal cyclic tensile loading

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 278, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114688

Keywords

Boundary effect; Fatigue life; Stiffness degradation; Damage cluster; FRP wires

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0703000]
  2. NSFC project [51878044]
  3. CSC Scholarship [201906460099]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a new damage model that can accurately predict the fatigue life and stiffness degradation of unidirectional FRP fibers through Monte Carlo simulations considering the variability in static strength and fatigue life. The analysis of the fatigue behavior of FRP wires reveals some quantitative information about the fatigue mechanism.
This paper develops a progressive fatigue damage model to study the initiation and progression of fiber damage in the unidirectional FRP considering the boundary effect. A characteristic representative volume element is proposed and a damage indicator describing the loss of load carrying capacity of fiber elements is introduced and combined with the principle of superposition to realize the stress redistribution caused by fiber breakage; the maximum fatigue stresses of the neighboring fiber elements affected by fiber breakage are updated. Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to study the fatigue behavior of FRP wires considering the effect of variabilities in the static strength and the fatigue life of single fibers. Results indicate that the proposed model can predict the fatigue life and stiffness degradation of FRP wires well compared with the experimental data. Specifically, the cluster sizes of critical damage for FRP wires during the fatigue process can be determined, which provides quantitative information for the fatigue mechanism of the FRP wires.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available