4.7 Article

Bond performance of tensile lap-spliced basalt-FRP reinforcement in high-strength concrete beams

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 281, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114987

Keywords

Lap-splice; Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP); Basalt FRP bars; High-strength concrete; Reinforced concrete beams; Bond

Funding

  1. Qatar University [QUCG-CENG-20/21-3]
  2. Qatar National Library

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the bond between SC-BFRP bars and concrete was slightly higher than that of HW-BFRP bars, while the bond strength of spliced BFRP bars was inversely related to the splice length. BFRP bars with larger diameter required longer splice lengths to reach their maximum capacity.
This paper investigates the bond between high-strength concrete (HSC) and tensile lap-spliced basalt fiberreinforced polymer (BFRP) bars. Ten large-scale BFRP-reinforced concrete beams (300 x 450 x 3900 mm) were fabricated and tested under four-point loading until failure. The parameters investigated included the BFRP bar diameter (10, 12, and 16 mm), the splice length (400-1200 mm range), and the bar surface texture (sandcoated (SC) and helically wrapped (HW)). Test results demonstrated that the flexural capacity of the beams reinforced with SC-BFRP bars was almost similar to that of beams reinforced with HW-BFRP bars. However, SCBFRP bars showed a slightly higher bond with concrete compared to that of helically wrapped counterparts. The bond strength of spliced BFRP bars was inversely related to the splice length. Also, BFRP bars with larger diameter bars require longer splice lengths to reach their maximum capacity. Finally, the experimentally estimated critical splice lengths were compared to those calculated by existing models and code-based equations. Both ACI 440.1R-15 and CSA S806-12 provisions were conservative in predicting splice length for BFRP bars. However, the CSA-S6-14 design code was more accurate in estimating the splice length for BFRP with bigger diameters. Though, it was not conservative with smaller diameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available