4.5 Article

New Betweenness Centrality Node Attack Strategies for Real-World Complex Weighted Networks

Journal

COMPLEXITY
Volume 2021, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2021/1677445

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM), Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam [B2017-42-01]
  2. Vietnam's Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) under the Vietnam-Italy scientific and technological cooperation program
  3. Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared a new node attack strategy with other known attack strategies on complex weighted networks, finding that this new strategy can significantly reduce the weighted efficiency of the network in some cases.
In this work, we introduce a new node attack strategy removing nodes with the highest conditional weighted betweenness centrality (CondWBet), which combines the weighted structure of the network and the node's conditional betweenness. We compare its efficacy with well-known attack strategies from literature over five real-world complex weighted networks. We use the network weighted efficiency (WEFF) like a measure encompassing the weighted structure of the network, in addition to the commonly used binary-topological measure, i.e., the largest connected cluster (LCC). We find that if the measure is WEFF, the CondWBet strategy is the best to decrease WEFF in 3 out of 5 cases. Further, CondWBet is the most effective strategy to reduce WEFF at the beginning of the removal process, whereas the Strength that removes nodes with the highest sum of the link weights first shows the highest efficacy in the final phase of the removal process when the network is broken into many small clusters. These last outcomes would suggest that a better attacking in weighted networks strategy could be a combination of the CondWBet and Strength strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available