4.6 Article

Growth performance, hematological responses and economic indexes of Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1818) fed graded levels of glycerol

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2021.109122

Keywords

Hematology; Nutrition; Fish; Growth; Biofuel residue

Funding

  1. Amazonas State Research Support Foundation (FAPEAM) [030/2013]
  2. FAPEAM
  3. CNPq [315713/2020-8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study results indicate that juvenile tambaqui diets can contain up to 50% replacement of corn by glycerol without compromising the fishes' development under the conditions studied.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance, hematological responses and economic indicators of juvenile tambaqui Colossoma macropomum fed different levels of partial replacement of corn by glycerol (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). The experiment was conducted for 90 days in the production of aquatic organisms lab at the Nilton Lins University, Manaus, Brazil, in a completely randomized design, and consisted of four treatments, four repetitions and two sampling times. In total, 240 juveniles were used with initial average weight and standard length of 15.32 +/- 1,61 g and 8.03 +/- 0.22 cm, respectively. The fish were maintained in twenty 310 L water tanks that had a closed system with no reuse, continuous aeration, siphoning and replacement of water every 48 h. Feeding was twice a day with the experimental diets, which contained 28% crude protein. The following parameters were considered: zootechnical checks (weight gain + survival %), welfare (health) (hepatosomatic index + condition factor + viscerosomatic index), economic (Economic efficiency rate + economic profitability index) and hematology (hematology + metabolites + ions). The results of the study show that diets for juvenile tambaqui can contain up to 50% replacement of corn by glycerol without compromising the fishes' development under the conditions studied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available