4.7 Article

Experimental and computational studies of methanol and ethanol preignition behind reflected shock waves

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 234, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111621

Keywords

Preignition; Non-homogeneous ignition; Ethanol; Methanol; Shock tube

Funding

  1. Saudi Aramco Research and Development Center FUELCOM program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental and computational investigations were conducted to identify the generalized criterion for predicting the preignition tendency of methanol and ethanol mixtures in shock tubes. The Sankaran number criterion was found to be the most successful predictor of the experimental observations.
Experimental and computational investigations are carried out to identify the generalized criterion to predict the preignition tendency of methanol and ethanol mixtures in shock tubes. Preignition or weak ignition in shock tubes has been reported to be a significant factor impacting the accuracy of the ignition delay times data. A systematic means to predict the extent of non-idealities needs to be established and validated with experimental data over a wide range of conditions. Measurements of ignition delay times of methanol and ethanol mixtures were performed to identify unexpectedly expedited ignition. Methanol mixtures showed preignition at low temperatures, similarly to ethanol mixtures. Endwall high-speed imaging was implemented to assess spatial uniformity of ignition for methanol and ethanol. Furthermore, 1-D simulations of ethanol/methanol mixtures, in the presence of ignition sources, were utilized to investigate various preignition criteria. The Sankaran number criterion (Sa(p)), proposed earlier for ignition regime identification, was found to be the most successful predictor of the experimental observations. (C) 2021 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available