4.3 Article

Temporal trends and current use of de novo belatacept in kidney transplant recipients in the United States

Journal

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14531

Keywords

costimulation; epidemiology; fusion proteins and monoclonal antibodies; belatacept; immunosuppressant; immunosuppressive regimen; induction; Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR)

Funding

  1. James M Cox Foundation
  2. Carlos and Marguerite Mason Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of de novo belatacept-based immunosuppressive therapy in US adult kidney transplant recipients has increased over time, but adoption remains slow. Different centers have utilized various regimens to modulate the risk of acute cellular rejection. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes and safety of these regimens, especially regarding the risk of infection.
The adoption of de novo belatacept in kidney transplant (kTx) recipients was hampered by an increased risk of acute cellular rejection (ACR) with variation in adopted belatacept based immunosuppressive therapies across centers. We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) to evaluate the temporal trends in belatacept use and describe the associated induction and maintenance regimens in US adult kTx recipients transplanted between June 2011 and December 2018. The number of patients receiving de novo-belatacept based immunosuppressive therapy increased from .74% in 2011 to 3.11% in 2016. In 2016, 66/207 centers used de novo belatacept-based regimen with 3.03% using it in over 50% of their patients. The use of T-cell depleting agents increased with time. Since 2012, the rate of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) use in combination with belatacept remained stable around 50% and similar to 30% remained under belatacept/CNI combination at 1-year post-transplantation. The adoption of belatacept as de novo immunosuppressive regimen has been slow and its use remains low in the United States. Various regimens have been used to modulate the risk of ACR. Further studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of these regimens and assessing their safety especially with regard to the risk of infection are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available