4.6 Article

Use of Real-World Data and Evidence in Drug Development of Medicinal Products Centrally Authorized in Europe in 2018-2019

Journal

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages 310-320

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2462

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GSK
  2. World Health Organization (WHO)
  3. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW)
  4. Dutch National Health Care Institute (ZIN)
  5. EC Horizon 2020
  6. Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB)
  7. Dutch Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the use of RWD/RWE in the pre-authorization phase of new medicines evaluated by the EMA in 2018-2019. It found that RWE signatures were commonly used in drug development, especially in the discovery and life-cycle management stages. Therapeutic areas such as oncology, hematology, and anti-infectives showed higher utilization of RWD/RWE in their full development phase.
Real-world data/real-world evidence (RWD/RWE) are considered to have a great potential to complement, in some cases, replace the evidence generated through randomized controlled trials. By tradition, use of RWD/RWE in the postauthorization phase is well-known, whereas published evidence of use in the pre-authorization phase of medicines development is lacking. The primary aim of this study was to identify and quantify the role of potential use of RWD/RWE (RWE signatures) during the pre-authorization phase, as presented in the initial marketing authorization applications of new medicines centrally evaluated with a positive opinion in 2018-2019 (n = 111) by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Data for the study was retrieved from the evaluation overviews of the European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs), which reflect the scientific conclusions of the assessment process and are accessible through the EMA website. RWE signatures were extracted into an RWE Data Matrix, including 11 categories divided over 5 stages of the drug development lifecycle. Nearly all EPARs included RWE signatures for the discovery (98.2%) and life-cycle management (100.0%). Half of them included RWE signatures for the full development phase (48.6%) and for supporting regulatory decisions at the registration (46.8%), whereas over a third (35.1%) included RWE signatures for the early development. RWE signatures were more often seen for orphan and conditionally approved medicines. Oncology, hematology, and anti-infectives stood out as therapeutic areas with most RWE signatures in their full development phase. The findings bring unprecedented insights about the vast use of RWD/RWE in drug development supporting the regulatory decision making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available