4.6 Article

Combining Dynamic Machining Feature With Function Blocks for Adaptive Machining

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASE.2015.2409294

Keywords

Adaptive machining; dynamic feature; function block

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51375239]
  2. Jiangsu Province Outstanding Youth Fund [BK20140036]
  3. New Century Excellent Talents Supporting Plan of the Education Ministry [NCEP-13-0856]
  4. Funding of Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education [CXZZ13_0181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Feature-based technologies are widely researched for manufacturing automation. However, in current feature models, features once defined remain constant throughout the whole manufacturing lifecycle. This static feature model is inflexible to support adaptive machining when facing frequent changes to manufacturing resources. This paper presents a new machining feature concept that facilitates responsive changes to the dynamics of machining features in 2.5/3D machining. Basic geometry information for feature construction of complex parts with various intersecting features is represented as a set of meta machining features (MMF). Optimum feature definition is generated adaptively by choosing optimum merging strategies of MMFs according to the capabilities of the selected machine tool, cutter, and cutting parameters. A composite function block for dynamic machining feature modelling is designed with Basic Machining Feature Function Block, Meta Machining Feature Extraction Function Block and Feature Interpreter Function Block. Once changes of the selected machining resources occur, they are informed as input events and machining features are then updated automatically and adaptively based on the event-driven model of function blocks. An example is provided to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of the developed methodology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available