4.2 Article

A One-Year Follow Up Study on Disability in Mental Health Nursing Practice

Journal

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 384-392

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10547738211073721

Keywords

disability; WHODAS 2; 0; outcome; mental health nurse practicing; real world studies

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Disability is common in patients with mental disorders, and therapeutic approaches should promote functional recovery to achieve the highest quality of life. This study reports changes in WHODAS 2.0 scores at 1 year of follow-up among patients receiving care from a single mental-health nurse in a community setting in Spain and compare these changes by diagnosis (SMI vs. CMI). The study found that all patients had improved WHODAS 2.0 scores in all domains except those domains related to work and relationships, and almost half of the patients were no longer undergoing treatment with the nurse at 1-year follow-up.
Disability is common in patients with mental disorders, and therapeutic approaches should promote functional recovery to achieve the highest quality of life. This study reports changes in WHODAS 2.0 scores at 1 year of follow-up among patients receiving care from a single mental-health nurse in a community setting in Spain and compare these changes by diagnosis (SMI vs. CMI). Baseline and 1-year follow-up scores were compared. For all participants, we collected sociodemographic information, clinical diagnosis, and disability scores according to WHODAS 2.0. Participating patients received the usual, non-manualized nursing intervention. Our sample comprised 133 patients, 75 of whom were assessed after 1 year. All patients had improved WHODAS 2.0 scores (difference of 9.20 +/- 2.42; p < .001) in all domains except those domains related to work (Life activities) and relationships (Getting along). Furthermore, almost half of the patients studied were no longer undergoing treatment with the nurse at 1-year follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available