4.6 Article

Image-guided TMS is safe in a predominately pediatric clinical population

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages 193-206

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.01.133

Keywords

Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Epilepsy; Children; Safety; Adverse events; Seizures; Brain tumor; Motor mapping; Language mapping

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the safety of TMS functional mapping in a clinical pediatric population and provided important insights into its use in patients with refractory epilepsy, brain tumor, or cranial metal.
Objective: The safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been previously evaluated in healthy volunteers and clinical adult populations. We sought to fill the gap in safety of TMS functional mapping in a clinical, predominately pediatric cohort. Methods: In a retrospective chart review, we assessed TMS motor and language mapping studies in persons with epilepsy or brain tumor for adverse events and safety of TMS, and in patients with cranial metal. Results: Out of 500 TMS sessions attempted in 429 individual patients (51% males, 82% <= 18 y), seizures occurred in 29 sessions (5.8%) during or after TMS with semiology consistent with their typical presentation and 53 patients (10.6%) experienced pain during stimulation. TMS was completed safely in 276 patients with cranial metal. Conclusions: Most TMS-related adverse events were benign and transient; the most serious safety events were seizures that could not be conclusively attributed to TMS. However, useful mapping results were obtained in almost all patients. Presence of cranial metal did not adversely affect TMS mapping. We show that TMS functional mapping is safe in a largely pediatric clinical cohort. Significance: This study demonstrates the safety of TMS functional mapping in patients with refractory epilepsy, brain tumor or cranial metal and fills a gap in knowledge for TMS safety in pediatric clinical population. (C) 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available