4.6 Article

Plastic responsiveness of motor cortex to paired associative stimulation depends on cerebellar input

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue 10, Pages 2493-2502

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.06.029

Keywords

Paired associative stimulation; Plasticity; Cerebellum; Theta-burst stimulation; GABA-ergic inhibition

Funding

  1. Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Science and Technology, Kerala, India [5168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that cerebellar stimulation can modulate the plastic response to PAS, and the M1 response of Non-Responders to PAS can be restored after cerebellar stimulation. This suggests that individual responses to plastic modulation may be influenced by the cerebellar neural system.
Objective: The extent of plastic responses of motor cortex (M1) to paired associative stimulation (PAS) varies among healthy subjects. Continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) of cerebellum enhances the mean PAS-induced plasticity in groups of healthy subjects. We tested whether the initial status of Responder or Non-Responder to PAS, influenced the effect of cerebellar stimulation on PAS-induced plasticity. Methods: We assessed in 19 young healthy volunteers (8 Responders, 11 Non-Responders to PAS), how cTBS and iTBS (intermittent TBS) applied to the cerebellum before a PAS protocol influenced the plastic responsiveness of M1 to PAS. We tested whether the PAS-induced plastic effects could be depotentiated by a short cTBS protocol applied to M1 shortly after PAS and whether cerebellar stimulation influenced GABA-ergic intracortical inhibition and M1 plasticity in parallel. Results: Cerebellar cTBS restored the M1 response to PAS in Non-Responders while cerebellar iTBS turned the potentiating response to PAS to a depressive response in both groups. The depotentiation protocol abolished both responses. Conclusion: Non-Responder status to PAS is a state of M1 amenable to bidirectional plastic modulation when primed by a change in cerebello-thalamic drive. Significance: The meaning of lack of responsiveness to certain protocols probing plasticity should be reconsidered. (c) 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available